Lilian Marmousez vs Tommaso Compagnucci Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Lilian Marmousez outperforms Tommaso Compagnucci marginally, with Marmousez winning 42.46% of second serve points compared to Compagnucci’s 41.16%. Could this offer an upper hand? Possibly.
• Return Game Stats: Compagnucci has a stronger return game on both first and second serves, winning 32.39% of first serves and 44.97% of second serves, compared to Marmousez’s 24.41% and 41.81% respectively. Does this suggest Compagnucci might have the edge when returning? Most likely.
• Under Pressure: When saving breakpoints, Compagnucci shows slightly better resilience, saving 52.90% compared to Marmousez’s 52.26%.
• Performance Overview: Over the past year, Marmousez has a higher match win rate at 74.65%, while Compagnucci stands at 62.69%. Does this give Marmousez an overall performance advantage? Yes.
• Best Surface: Both players excel on clay with a 68% win rate, yet both struggle on their least favorable surfaces, with Marmousez on indoor hard (39%) and Compagnucci on hard courts (39%).
• Player Level: Marmousez performs better in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 81.63% of matches versus Compagnucci’s 68.63%. Could this indicate higher potential at this level? Certainly.
• Opponent Quality: Compagnucci faces slightly tougher opponents, with an average opponent rank of 375.22 compared to Marmousez’s 461.38. Might this enhance Compagnucci’s competitive edge? Possibly.
• Deciding Set Performance: In matches that go the distance, Marmousez leads with a 77% win rate in deciding sets, against Compagnucci’s 67%. Could this indicate better stamina? Likely.
• Break Point Conversion: Compagnucci is more efficient at taking his chances, converting 41.63% of break points, considerably higher than Marmousez’s 30.22%.

Editorial Prediction (November 24, 2025, UTC):

As we examine the data, a few key advantages emerge for each player. Lilian Marmousez demonstrates slightly superior performance in overall match-winning percentage and deciding set wins, providing him with a notable resilience edge. His second serve points percentage is also marginally higher, which could be crucial if serving under pressure.

Conversely, Tommaso Compagnucci exhibits stronger return game statistics, both on first and second serves, and demonstrates higher efficiency in converting break points. His ability to tackle players with a better average rank suggests he could handle higher levels of competitiveness better.

Ultimately, while both players exhibit strengths and weaknesses, Lilian Marmousez appears slightly more poised to claim victory, primarily due to his overall winning percentage and decisive set record, suggesting greater consistency and resilience.